1. Lithuania
Qualifying Record: 8/15
Qualifying Record 50/50 era: 3/6
Running Order Record 50/50 era: 7/12
Current Country Streak: 1 NQ
Current Running Order Streak: 1 NQ
Thursday, 1 April 2021
Monday, 22 March 2021
Winner's Market: The rest of the field and the sleepers
Last week we had a first look to the hot favourites of this year and today I will close the list with the rest of the countries that are leading the market and share some early thoughts about a few sleepers.
Since last Monday, Malta has taken the lead because of Gjon's first live performance yesterday in a Spanish show that was underwhelming in general. The interesting thing is that Malta's price has not shorten a bit, is Switzerland's price that drifted. The other big winner of the week is our first country in today's post.
France 7.80
Another ambitious effort from France that has shown some signs of life in the last five years. Voila' is a very theatrical performance with many Edith Piaf elements and an Amelie themed last minute, trying to create an intimate atmosphere talking to the psyche of the viewer. France wants to win the whole thing.
Pros:
- The staging of the national final does create that intimacy and it plays well with the shadows. It looks like a finished product
- Barbara Pravi is delivering an amazing performance selling this song as much as possible.
Cons:
- Another jury magnet and the second among the favourites in French. The last time that a French language song was in Top-3 was back in 1993...and it was Switzerland...It would be a shocker to have two French songs in Top-5.
- The televoting appeal that France is missing. France was a Top-4 favourite at one point back in 16', 18' and 19'. All 3 times failed to finish in Top-5, ranking 9th, 17th and 18th respectively in PV. In 2011 it was the big favourite to win and finished 15th...
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
France 2008
Estonia 2018
France 2018
Fair Price: 12.00-15.00
Bet Value Price: I wouldn't personally touch France in prices below 20 given their track record and this year's field.
My humble opinion: I do understand why France is among the favourites but unfortunately it does not work for me. It gives me Estonia 2018 and France 2018 vibes: among the favourites, being the quality song that will stand out. The best term I would use to describe it though is 'pseudo' quality. It is a normal slightly repetitive song that tries to sell itself as something different. Not all viewers will be impressed. Would not be surprised if it landed 8th-12th
Lithuania 21.00
One of the big losers from last year's cancelation. Roop are coming back with a competitive disco-techno electro entry. Discoteque is a powerful song, but it falls short in comparison with On Fire. The group is trying to recreate the atmosphere from last year but that is not enough.
Pros:
- It's a finished product and we do know their vocal abilities.
Cons:
- The comparison with On Fire
- The appeal both on juries and PV. I can see it finishing in Top-10 with both, but I fail to see it reaching Top-5 in any of the two
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Poor man's Belgium 2015
Fair Price: 60.00- 80.00
Bet Value Price: 100+ if after the jury vote is in or in reaching distance of Top-5.
My humble opinion: Lithuania 2020 was in the mix to win, and we will never know what would happen. Lithuania 2021 would be happy with a Top-10 and this is what I believe it will happen. 6th-12th is the most probable outcome.
Iceland 24.00
The biggest loser of last year! Everything was aligned for Iceland to win and then covid happened. Dadi is back with the almost impossible task to create a back-to-back winner song. 10 Years tries to recreate the hype that Talk About Things had but market did not react the way Iceland would hope. Another 80's revival entry, similar choreography to last year and probably the same suits. Can he do it?
Pros:
-Slick choreography and cool suits. For most of the viewers this is the first time that they will see the whole act and will attract some novelty and young votes.
- It has the potential to create some hype during the rehearsals
-Televote friendly
Cons:
- Uplifting but looks like it is missing the energy.
- Jury appeal is not there. Will get some ally points and some random 2-4s but won't be enough to keep it in contention after the jury votes.
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Denmark 2018 - Norway 2019. Will continue the tradition of a Scandi song finishing in Top-5 with the Televoting but it will already be late because of the Juries.
Fair Price: 35.00-40.00
Bet Value Price: Over 60.00 if and only if will be able to get more than 175-200 points with the juries. Then it will still have a slim chance to win.
My humble opinion: Iceland could be the regulator in televoting and affect the results. Could possibly win in the 100% Televoting era but has very very slim chances with the current voting system.
These are the 8 songs that are leading the Winner's market. Like every year, we will have a few more songs that will come out of nowhere. There is always one that sneaks in the Top-5 and at least one that sneaks in the Top-10. I will keep an eye on the following countries, waiting to see their rehearsals
Russia 50.00 - Powerhouse with many allies and a song that could get some western votes enough to secure a Top-5 finishing
Moldova 65.00 - aka Russia 2.0 for the Russian allies to choose if they don't like Russia 1.0. Kirkorov's way of doing business.
Belgium 130.00 - Hooverphonic is a big brand name with its fans and the song has a radio quality. The live could bring this one in life.
Romania 65.00 - If it manages to avoid comparisons with Bulgaria and Billie Eilish. Great stage potential.
In the next few weeks, you will find a full report/preview for all the participants but that will happen after the reveal of the running order for the Semis.
In the meantime, I might post something more technical/ data driven.
Monday, 15 March 2021
Winner's Market - First Thoughts
My first thought is that this will be an open year. We do have a clear favourite, but the current price does not represent its actual value.
The current trend has Juries and Televoting opting for different songs with the last unanimous winner being back in 2017. Only Sobral and Conchita, if the 50/50 results applied, have won both the Juries and Televoting. Arcade was the first winner that not only did not win Juries or the public but finished 3rd and 2nd respectively. Italy that finished second, ranked third with Juries and fourth in public. Neither the winner of Juries nor Televoting finished in Top-5! Some food for thought...
2019 2018
1. Netherlands J: 3 - TV: 2 1. Israel J: 3 - TV:1
2. Italy J: 4 - TV: 3 2. Cyprus J: 5 - TV: 2
3. Russia J: 9 - TV: 4 3. Austria J: 1 - TV: 13!!
4. Switzerland J: 7 - TV: 5 4. Germany J: 4 - TV: 6
5. Sweden J: 2 - TV: 9 5. Italy J:17!!! - TV: 3
Prices in Winner's market tend to be televoting centric.
So, grab your popcorn and let's start
1. Switzerland 4.10
Gjon's Tears is one of the few returning artists that produced a better song than last year. He would have been in the podium last year as well, but this is his time to shine. An immensely powerful and intimate ballad with huge staging potential.
Pros:
- Vocal abilities
- Staging potential
- The jury winner
- Swiss momentum and recent form, proving that they have invested in a win
Cons:
- French language. The last time a French speaking song was leading the market (2011) finished 15th. It was opera and there was a different voting system as well, but French songs do have the tendency to underperform.
- Fishing in the same pond with France, Bulgaria, Romania.
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Netherlands 2019 slightly less dramatic
Bulgaria 2017
Fair Price: 6.00 - 8.00
Value Bet Price: Anything over 8.00. That ship has already sailed for good. I cannot see that price being available before the night of the second semi and if that is the case, he will already be in trouble.
My humble opinion: This is the one to beat this year but is far from a certain winner. It's a certain Top-4 entry, probably the Jury winner with 3rd being the worst-case scenario but can he finish Top-3 with the televoting? That is the key point, and we need to see the staging for that.
2. Malta 5.40
And suddenly Malta happened! The upbeat song that I was expecting to do great in the first post-covid Eurovision. Great energy and vocals from Destiny. Grabs your attention from the first second and never looks back.
Pros:
- Energy, energy, energy
- Destiny's voice
- Can use the back vocals to its advantage
- Great ''tradition'' with Juries
Cons:
- It looks like a lite version of Netta's toy
- I am not sure about its appeal in Eastern Europe, both with Juries and Televoting
- Fishing in the same pond with Sweden
- The Maltese Televoting...Malta struggles to get points. 2014 finished 13th in total with the 50/50 system, but ranked only 24th in televoting, in 2016 12th in total and 21st in televoting, 2019 14th in total and 22nd respectively...ouch...
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Israel 2018
Iceland 2010
Fair Price: 8.00-10.00
Value Bet Price: Over 12.00. Not sure if will find it at any point before the announcement of the running order for the final.
My humble opinion: Still very fresh in my mind. The one to beat Switzerland but could easily be left out of Top-5. Could land anywhere between 1-8. Need some time to assess its dynamic
3. Bulgaria 8.80
Victoria returns with a nice entry. GUIGO has the potential to be a radio hit and is one of the less Eurovision-ish songs which is always a good thing for the audience but not so much if you are after the win. It has potential.
Pros:
- Atmospheric and huge staging potential as well
- Great appeal to western juries and televoters plus the traditional regional support (hold that thought)
- Bulgaria wants to win.
- Billie Eilish vibes
Cons:
- Like Switzerland, is jury based and that might be a problem
- Bulgaria's PR. Still not convinced that Bulgaria has learned from the past how to play the game.
- Balkans are making a comeback in the contest with enough strong entries that might steal votes from Bulgaria (Romania, Greece, Cyprus, Moldova, Croatia). So, it is a matter of who will qualify to the final. The less the better for them.
- Staging History. They did everything right back in 2016 and 2017 but 2018 was a nightmare. They tend to overcomplicate things when less is more.
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Bulgaria 2017
Fair Price: 12.00- 15.00
Bet Value Price: Anything around 18.00. Being in the same Semi with Switzerland, there is a chance to take it at that price after the Semi.
My humble opinion: Bulgaria is in for the win, and they should be proud for their song no matter what happens this year. It is an almost certain Top-5, probably Top-3 with Juries and somewhere between Top-3/5 with televoting. For the moment is one step behind Switzerland and Malta.
4. Italy 12.50
Well done to Italy for choosing Maneskin. It has the energy; it has attitude and does not care about what you think! Excellent choice regardless of what happens in the contest. My personal favourite so biased alert is on.
Pros:
- Very stylistic and in your face approach
- Will definitely attract alternative and rock fans
- Based in momentum and form in Eurovision, Italy is first in line to win the contest
Cons:
- Overly aggressive and slightly left field. It's not everyone's cup of tea.
- Italy's struggle with Juries. They have ranked Il Volo 6th when it won the Televoting against Mans and they finished 17th!!! in 2018 when they were 3rd in Televoting and still managed to finish 5th in Total! The worst ranking with Juries or Televoting that has squeezed in Top-5.
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Iceland 2019
Hungary 2018
Fair Price: 16.00-18.00
Bet Value Price: 20+ with a good running order and some luck that could be the definition of the dark horse.
My humble opinion: I am optimistic about Italy and could see it landing somewhere in Top-2/5. Will test one of my theories for Eurovision which is Juries and audience are exposed to something for a 2nd or 3rd time it is easier for them to accept it. Before Dana in 98' it was Paul Oscar in 97', before Lordi in 06' there were Wig Wam in 05' etc. In 2019 we had Hatari and Conan. I'm sure that Maneskin will do better than Hatari.
5. Sweden 14.50
Melfest's results showed that Tusse was a one-horse race, winning easily. Million Voices is a classic Swedish Eurovision anthem and in harmony with BLM trend, but it seems a bit too safe as a song. The price like every year shows some extra respect to the brand name called Sweden.
Pros:
- We know the final product and it is slick as almost every Swedish entry
- Sweden's ''love affair'' with the Juries that will lift the overall score
- Tusse's personal story and charisma
Cons:
- The song is kind of generic and nothing special in terms of lyrics
- Have televoters been fed up with the Swedish entries?
- Could Tusse appeal to Eastern Europe?
If I had to compare it with a past entry that would be:
Russia's 2015 poor version
Russia 2013
Fair Price: 22.00-25.00
Value Bet Price: 30.00+and just for trading reasons
My humble opinion: Sweden's Top-5 is in serious danger this season. Cannot see it going lower than 12th but neither can see it reaching Top-5. 7th-8th is the most probable outcome.
These are my first thoughts for the contest. Will post next week regarding the possible dark horses and the flops. It looks like we will have a very promising Eurovision Season ahead!
Monday, 8 March 2021
Eurovision's pre Rehearsals Essential Pack
I do reckon that 2021 will have a few hiccups as well, but hopefully will not impact the Contest. In this post I will try to summarise what we know so far and give a few key points for pre-rehearsals betting. Here we go...
What we know so far:
EBU has opted for Scenario B, which means that all or most of the participants will sing live from Ahoy Arena.
It will be a socially distanced event and delegations have to produce a live - on - tape performance in case they cannot make it to Rotterdam or they have to self isolate.
There will be a reduced audience in the Arena. ( Personally doubt about it)
For the first time delegations can use pre - recorded backing vocals, with no limits on the number of backing singers, allowing better staging for songs that are based on a choreography.
How all these impact the Contest?
My biggest fear so far is that some of the delegations might not be able to travel to Rotterdam and instead we will watch the live - on - tape performance. That is a game changer. Those who watched San Remo will know that Irama, one of the performers had to self isolate because of contact tracing and the producers used a recorded rehearsal. He was close to Top-3 but I do think that his absence has impacted his ranking. All other artists were able to change costumes and interact with the presenters and the TV audience. His clip felt kind of soulless.
Pre recorded performance could be a burden for some delegations that do not have the means or the experience to stage one...Armenia has already withdrawn from the Contest because it did not have the time and means to produce a song. If I had to guess, I do believe that at least 2-3 more countries will not show up in Rotterdam and will opt for the Tape just for the sake of participating. I wish to be proved wrong.
The backing vocals is another game changer. Who will use them more efficienlty to produce something innovative and out of the Eurovision thinking box? This aspect might be the Wow factor for this year, similar to Sweden 2015 or Ukraine 2016.
Sharing some thoughts about pre-rehearsal betting:
In this section I will share some principles that I use every year and help me having profits every year for the last decade.
1. Wait for all songs to be revealed before start betting. The majority of the favorites and the power houses all reveal their entries in the last few days. Wait to hear/see all of them before start betting heavily. In this Contest you can find opportunities to bet until the final results are revealed during the final. The false favorites are flowering this time of the year...
There are still 17 entries to be revealed in the next days...Use timing wisely
2. This year we have many returning artists because of what happened last year. Be aware of the anchor effect! Sending a good entry in 2020 doesn't mean that 2021 will be the same. The only returning artists that do better the second time are the ones that failed to qualify the first one...
Iceland would probably have been the Winner last year. Can they win this year? Maybe...But leading the Winner market @ 7.4 without having listened to an entry that comes from a nation that has never won and finished 2nd just twice in their history is not exactly the definition of a value bet...
3. The lack of Eurovision parties. The backing vocals might reduce the impact of those, but we will end up going in rehearsals without having heard some of the songs performed live. Less data to collect means smaller amount of bets to be placed. Patience is a virtue.
4. The impact of the lack of audience that will affect the uplifting entries or the ones that will be relying to the creation of some intimacy. I reckon this will be the year we will see some holograms of fans/people on stage or on the background to help the contestants.
5. I have a feeling that the winner of this year will be an uplifting entry. It has been a very tough year and most of us feel tired, depressed, stressed, trapped and Eurovision will be a Saturday night that finally people can party and forget all those horrible months. It is something that people need and are looking forward to. This is just a gutt feeling.
17 entries are left to be revealed and I don't think we have listened/seen the winner yet. I will be posting on a weekly basis for the next few weeks and will do a basic anaysis on every participant when we will know the running order of the Semis.
It feels nice to be back to the pre-Eurovision routine!
Thursday, 2 April 2020
EurovisionBets&Pieces: The Eurovision Finals' Data Analysis that rules them all!!!
Two weeks ago that would be a post about the 2020 market favourites and the trends of the market but it was obvious that this Eurovision was not meant to happen and sadly we have the first contest that was cancelled. Though I do believe that this is the last of the things that we currently have in mind and the decision to cancel was the right thing to do.
I do believe that an era has closed and next year we will have a very different reality in terms of the contest. I am sure that we will see countries withdrawing next year because of lack of funding unless EBU cuts down the cost of participation. We maybe see countries out of Europe participating to balance the numbers but that's something that we will see in the future.
Trying to beat the pre-post cancelled Eurovision depression, I have decided to start posting some technical pieces to keep you some company while being in lockdown and with plenty of time in your hands.
The first post will be about the Finals. I have gathered the split results for the years 2016-2019 plus the years 2014 and 2015. There was a different voting system them, but since we do have available the split results it does help to have a bigger sample in order to be able to draw some conclusions.
The question that I have tried to answer is what's the recipe to become a winner. What's the ideal combination that guarantees the win and here are my findings. Fasten your seatbelt and let's start!!!
Winners' rankings with Juries and Televoting
So far we have the following combinations for the winners
2014: Austria: J: 1 - TV: 1
2015: Sweden: J: 1 - TV: 3
2016: Ukraine: J: 2 - TV: 2
2017: Portugal: J: 1 - TV: 1
2018: Israel: J: 3 - TV: 1
2019: Netherlands: J: 3 - TV: 2
2015: Sweden: J: 1 - TV: 3
2016: Ukraine: J: 2 - TV: 2
2017: Portugal: J: 1 - TV: 1
2018: Israel: J: 3 - TV: 1
2019: Netherlands: J: 3 - TV: 2
Out of the six winners we do have two clear favorites that won both the Juries and Televoting, two that won one of the two and were 3rd on the other half and two winners that haven't topped either of the two. Netherlands won last year even though it finished third with Juries and second with Televoting and it is more impressive that Italy who finished second was 4th with the Juries and 3rd with the Televoting.
The average Jury rankings for the winners is 1.83 and the Televoting 1.67.
The average points for the winner are 581.7 or 60.85% of the maximum available points that equals to 7.3 pts per jury or televoting.
The best scoring performance was from Portugal 2017 with 758pts, 77.03% of the maximum points or 9.24 pts.
The lowest score for a winner is Netherlands' 2019 498pts, just 51.88% of the available points to grab, an average of 6.23 pts.
The average difference between the winner and the second place is 83.2 points. The biggest lead was in 2017 with 143 points of distance between Portugal and Bulgaria and the smallest mark the 23 points that secured the win for Ukraine in 2016 with Australia coming really close.
What's more important? Winning the Juries or the Televoting?
This is the most interesting part of the analysis. I observed the Top-5s in the final rankings and for Juries and Televoting seperately and these are my findings:
Average rankings with Juries and Televotings from Winner to 5th
Winner: J: 1.83 - TV: 1.65
Winner: J: 1.83 - TV: 1.65
2nd: J: 3 - TV: 2.5
3rd: J: 5.2 - TV: 4.17
4th: J: 6.12 - TV: 4.67
5th: J: 6.5 - TV: 7
There is a pattern there. Televoting tends to score slighlty better than the Juries and that is because Televoting winners tend to have wider margins and score more consistently than the Jury winners! Have a look to the average points for each place for Juries and Televoting individually.
Winner: J: 299.5 pts / 62.66% of maximum available points
TV: 337.7 pts/ 70.65% of maximum available points
TV: 337.7 pts/ 70.65% of maximum available points
2nd: J: 238.8 pts / 49.96% of maximum available points
TV: 280 pts / 58.58% of maximum available points
3rd: J: 208.1 pts / 43.54% of maximum available points
TV: 243.5 pts / 50.94% of maximum available points
4th: J: 182.1 pts / 38.09% of maximum available points
TV: 215.5 pts / 45.08% of maximum available points
5th: J: 160.1 pts / 33.49% of maximum available points
TV: 183 pts / 38.28% of maximum available points
Televoting secures a 23-38 pts handicap on every place. We have to go to the 7th place to see Juries scoring better than Televoting ( 134.6 vs 125.8). Finishing 3rd in Televoting is better than finishing 2nd with Juries and gives a clear advantage. The reason for that is the longer tail with the Juries. They tend to distribute their points to more countries. From 7th to 25th Jury points have a higher average than Televoting. Be it professionalism or the exchange of points between allies the jurors tend to vote more countries.
The next thing I did was to check the average rankings on the other half and the final scoreboard for the Top-5s in Juries and Televoting (eg: Jury winner: what's its average ranking in televoting and the average ranking in the combined scoreboard)
Juries
Winner: TV: 5.67 - Final Ranking: 2.5 - Deviation +4.67 / +1.5
Winner: TV: 5.67 - Final Ranking: 2.5 - Deviation +4.67 / +1.5
2nd: TV: 7.83 - Final Ranking: 4 - Deviation +5.83 / +2
3rd: TV: 4 - Final Ranking: 2.83- Deviation +1 / -0.17
4th: TV: 11.8 - Final Ranking: 6.17 - Deviation +7.8 / +2.17
5th: TV: 6.33 - Final Ranking: 5.33 - Deviation +1.33 / +0.33
Televoting
Winner: J: 5.67 - Final Ranking: 2.5 - Deviation +4.67 / +1.5
2nd: J: 3 - Final Ranking: 1.67 - Deviation +1 / -0.33
3rd: J: 9.5 - Final Ranking: 3.67 - Deviation +6.5 / +0.67
4th: J: 7.33 - Final Ranking: 3.83 - Deviation +3.33 / -0.17
5th: J: 13.83 - Final Ranking: 6.67 - Deviation +8.83 / +1.67
The winners of the individual boards have secured three wins but only have the 2nd best average.
The best place to be is finishing 2nd in televoting that has an average ranking of 1.67. That spot has given two winners and four 2nd place finishings.
The other spot where Juries and Televoters tend to agree more is finishing 3rd with Juries that secures an average ranking of 2.83 and has given the two winners in the last two years: Israel 2018, Netherlands 2019. This is definitely a trend that we should keep in mind
The other important finding is that Televoting tends to be closer to the final rankings with smaller deviations and can survive and bounce back even when the Juries try to punish it.
Televoting has punished a Top-5 jury 6 times, ranking it below Top-10 and forced two of them to finish out of Top-10.
There were 8 cases where a Televoting Top-5 has scored worse than a Top-10 with Juries but none of these discrepancies forced a finishing outside the Top-10.
I hope that find these findings useful for your future bettings or Eurovision analysis. Will try to post as often as possible to keep the conversation going. Please feel free to comment or add any valuable insights.
Sunday, 19 January 2020
Eurovision 2020: This is the beginning...
The national final season is here and allocation draw for the Semi Finals will be announced in the next few days.
We will have plenty of time in the following weeks to comment on the songs and I will post a few technical posts regarding the Semis but I would like to use this first post to share some thoughts and tips.
My philosophy during the National Finals season is to get involved as less as possible. I never bet on them and don't even watch. There is a huge amount of energy, data and noise that do not provide enough feedback. I prefer to listen/watch only the songs that have won their final or were chosen to represent a country. There is no point to extend the 2-2.5 months of thinking/projecting/estimating to 4 months.
Rule No2: Never place a bet on Eurovision before all the songs are known. You might lose some value but is more likely to lose lots of money on a false favorite. The last few years it has been the norm that all the favorites and power houses announce their songs in the last weekend before the EBU delegation meeting, the only exception is Italy because of the traditional dates of San Remo festival.
Rule No3: Do not forget the context. A live finished production (call me Swedish winner) cannot be compared with an impressive video clip. Staging and live vocals are two very very very important factors. Do not get over excited. The live concerts in late April could be more useful.There will be plenty of opprtunities during rehearsals and the nights of the shows.
Rule No4: The first impression is very important. I always make sure to pay attention to a song I'm listening for the first time. Always taking in consideration the context but the majority of the viewers will listen to the songs only one time.
Rule No5: The more difficult to follow! Don't forget the bubble. We hear the song so many times, we read so many analyses and so many different opinions that we forget the basic. Always follow your instict. It's your money and your ideas! Put your money where your mouth is!
My Eurovision Betting Philosophy: Patience, patience and some more patience. There are always opportunities. Even when the voting is in process there is a chance to find some value.
Momentum is another important concept. The country that wins the contest has usually been after the win for a few years. Netherlands was looking for a win since 2013 and making it last year is the perfect example. There is Sweden and Norway that always aiming for the win and it is safe to add Russia to the same category. National final for the first two and money to spend for the later make them favorites every year.
The countries that have created a momentum in the last few years and I will follow them closely are the following:
Italy: 3rd in '15, 6th in'17, 5th in'18 and 2nd last year. Italian artists realised that Eurovision can provide an international audience and that's making a difference. It's a matter of time for Italy to win the contest after almost 30 years.
Belgium: Great streak from '15 to '17 (4th, 10th, 4th) followed by 2 failures to qualify to the final but this year is sending the biggest name in the contest for a while. Hooverphonic is a proof that Belgium is after the win!
Bulgaria: They have spent so much money between 2016-2018 that had to withdraw last year because of lack of funds. Curious to see the level of production.
France: Not so many great results but they show an ambition to win the contest. There were some structural changes this year. We will have to find out when they present their song.
Switzerland: Was it an one off last year? Will they try to capitalise on last year's result?
Australia: They are here to stay and they want to win the trophy! Five participations, four Top-10 results with a 2nd and a 5th place. Australians are investing heavily and eventually they will be rewarded.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)