Tuesday, 12 May 2026

Bring It!

 




 The judgement day has finally arrived and tonight the big guns will have to put every card on the table. With Semi-Final 1 shaping up to be comfortably the weakest Semi of the last decade, the spotlight shifts almost entirely towards one question: who leaves tonight with the momentum — Greece or Finland?

For the first time in months, Finland’s grip at the top of the market looks slightly vulnerable.

Yesterday belonged to Greece.

The Greek delegation finally unveiled the full staging concept and the reaction across the arena, fandom and betting markets was immediate. Akylas and Fokas have delivered a performance that feels less like a Eurovision entry and more like a three-minute cinematic experience, divided into chapters and packed with visual moments.

The market reacted aggressively. Greece opened yesterday around 7.00 to win Eurovision, crashed into the 3.65 range during the evening and eventually stabilised around 4.00-4.20.

That kind of move is never accidental.

The key question now is whether Greece can fully steal the narrative tonight after the Semi-Final result. Momentum matters enormously in Eurovision betting and this feels like the first genuine attack on Finland’s long-standing position at the top.

Finland, to their credit, remain extremely solid. The performance works, the audience is fully engaged and they still possess the cleanest televote package in the competition. However, for the first time in three months, we have finally seen the market blink.

Finland drifted from the 2.10-2.20 region into 2.50-2.60 after rehearsals, a sign that traders are starting to question whether this is still a runaway favourite or simply the market leader in a very open year.

Thursday could complicate matters even further if France and Australia land properly.

The other major winner from yesterday was Moldova. The fandom has finally jumped on a train that sharp bettors boarded weeks ago. Moldova’s Top-10 odds have collapsed from the 3.25-3.50 range into 1.80 and that move feels entirely justified.

This has comfortably been my strongest pre-rehearsal position of the season.

The televote ceiling is massive and in a weak Semi-Final they suddenly have a realistic path towards a Top-3 finish tonight.

There will be plenty of time after the show to dissect the winners, losers and market overreactions, but for now it is time for the traditional Semi-Final 1 projection.

1. Greece

Jury: 110-125
Televote: 130-145
Total: 240-270

Akylas delivers vocally, Fokas once again proves why he remains one of Eurovision’s elite staging minds and Greece suddenly feels like the entry everyone will be talking about after tonight.

This is not simply “artsy” Eurovision. It is accessible, emotional and visually memorable while still offering enough sophistication for juries to reward it heavily.

The final minute in particular feels tailor-made for jury appeal.

The Semi draw is also favourable, with enough allies to support both voting components. Greece to win Semi-Final 1 around 4.10 looks like clear betting value.

2. Finland

Jury: 120-130
Televote: 100-110
Total: 220-240

No real concerns for Finland.

The performance lands exactly as expected and the crowd response remains huge. However, yesterday’s audience poll — where they surprisingly finished behind Moldova among a heavily western crowd — is at least worth monitoring.

Tonight’s scoreboard will tell us far more.

The issue from a betting perspective is purely price-related. Finland winning the Semi around 1.91 offers very little value considering the growing competition around them.

3. Moldova

Jury: 75-85
Televote: 120-130
Total: 195-215

Can Moldova overtake Israel and sneak into the Top-3?

I believe they can.

Israel traditionally overperforms in western televoting markets but their eastern support historically has not been nearly as dominant, opening the door for Moldova to capitalise in this specific Semi.

Moldova now looks extremely well positioned for a Top-10 finish in the Final and potentially even a Top-5 televote result overall.

Liquidity remains poor in the speciality markets, but anything above 2.50-2.75 for Moldova Top-3 tonight still looks playable.

4. Israel

Jury: 55-65
Televote: 105-115
Total: 160-180

The growing attempts to control or suppress Israel’s televote narrative feel mistimed and potentially counterproductive.

If anything, making Israel the central talking point only increases public mobilisation.

The more interesting question tonight concerns the juries. In a Semi-Final environment where qualification is relatively safe, jurors may feel freer to score this entry naturally without broader strategic considerations.

The Semi mix is not especially friendly though, which could leave Israel vulnerable to a lower-than-expected placement.

5. Croatia

Jury: 50-65
Televote: 80-100
Total: 130-165

This was an entry I was looking to oppose ever since Dora, but the delegation has improved steadily throughout the season.

The girls are performing better with every rehearsal and the staging adds the extra impact the package needed.

Qualification looks comfortable and the bigger question now is whether Croatia can build enough late momentum to threaten the Final Top-10.

6. Sweden

Jury: 70-80
Televote: 45-55
Total: 115-135

Sweden are fortunate to be competing in this particular Semi-Final because a stronger draw could have created genuine danger.

This entry feels heavily “Melodifestivalen-coded” — something that works domestically but loses impact on the Eurovision stage.

Felicia’s personal story resonates in Sweden, but internationally the styling choices, mask concept and dark staging create unnecessary barriers for viewers and juries alike.

The market has finally started adjusting. A Top-10 finish in the Final now feels increasingly unrealistic, especially with Finland and Denmark offering much stronger overall packages.

My average lay at 1.64 remains one of my best positions of the year. The market now trades around 2.08.

7. Poland

Jury: 65-75
Televote: 40-50
Total: 105-125

Potentially the biggest grower of the Semi.

My main concern pre-rehearsals was Poland’s historic jury weakness, particularly with a jury-oriented entry. However, the staging has elevated the package considerably and qualification now feels more likely than not.

Still not fully safe — but definitely moving towards qualification territory.

8. Serbia

Jury: 35-45
Televote: 50-60
Total: 85-105

We have officially entered the danger zone.

Serbia traditionally thrives in borderline qualification scenarios and there are enough regional connections here — particularly Croatia and Montenegro — to provide a foundation in the televote.

At the same time, this absolutely could miss out.

There may be slight value opposing Serbia, but this is not a market I am eager to attack.

9. Estonia

Jury: 45-55
Televote: 40-50
Total: 85-105

Another genuine coinflip.

The running order helps and credibility matters enormously in the chaotic second half of this Semi. Estonia at least feels professional and coherent, which could prove decisive.

Lithuania, Finland and Sweden also provide useful voting connections.

I backed Estonia pre-rehearsals above 2.50 and the market now trades around 3.20. The more interesting angle might actually be Top Baltic Entry at 6.00-7.00, which still retains value even if qualification is missed.

10. San Marino

Jury: 45-55
Televote: 40-50
Total: 85-105

Every second year I find myself chasing a San Marino qualification ticket. Previous attempts came in 2022 and 2024.

Could this finally be the year?

Pre-rehearsals I had San Marino dead last in my rankings, but the staging has transformed the entry entirely. Boy George’s involvement feels deliberately designed to generate commentator buzz and casual audience attention.

If San Marino can activate their traditional “jury dark arts” through countries like Greece, Montenegro and Italy, qualification around 4.70 is worth the gamble.

A bet I am always happy to lose.


11. Portugal

Jury: 45-55
Televote: 15-25
Total: 60-80

The return of juries to the Semi-Finals theoretically keeps Portugal alive, but I still struggle to construct a realistic qualification path.

This is an entry almost entirely dependent on jury support and even there, I am not convinced the ceiling is high enough. To qualify comfortably, Portugal probably needs a Top-5 or Top-6 jury result and I simply do not see enough standout moments for that to happen.

The televote outlook is weak, the running order does not help and the overall pace of the Semi could leave this entry completely exposed.

I would not be shocked if Portugal sneaks through, but from a betting perspective I cannot find any value in the current qualification price.

12. Lithuania

Jury: 25-35
Televote: 30-40
Total: 55-75

This is where the maths start becoming very uncomfortable.

Lithuania is traditionally a weak jury nation, lacks meaningful voting allies in this Semi outside Estonia and Poland and does not benefit from any significant diaspora presence tonight.

Then there is the performance itself.

Vocally, the jury rehearsal was reportedly rough and this is not the type of entry that can survive weak vocals in front of jurors. Add the alien-inspired styling and inaccessible presentation and suddenly the qualification price looks completely disconnected from reality.

Trading around 1.50 to qualify makes absolutely no sense to me.

Lithuania not to qualify at 3.00 is, in my opinion, the standout value bet of Semi-Final 1.

13. Montenegro

Jury: 20-30
Televote: 35-45
Total: 55-75

Can neighbours and hardcore fans drag Montenegro across the line?

Possibly — but I remain highly sceptical.

The delegation has staged this entry in an oddly aggressive way, trying so hard to create impact that they may have alienated both jurors and casual viewers in the process.

This feels like a classic fandom bubble entry. Eurovision fans may appreciate the chaos and intensity, but regular viewers often react very differently.

Tonight will be a fascinating test of how influential the fanbase really is in Semi-Final voting.

I have included Montenegro in several non-qualification combo bets alongside Belgium and Georgia.

14. Belgium

Jury: 30-45
Televote: 15-25
Total: 45-70

At this stage there is very little left to analyse.

Belgium simply never recovered from the rehearsal week and the entry now feels completely devoid of momentum. Neither the staging nor the live performance elevated the package and in a televote-heavy environment this becomes extremely dangerous.

The juries may throw a few respectable scores their way, but the televote ceiling looks alarmingly low.

There is still some value including Belgium in non-qualification combinations and that remains the only angle I would consider betting-wise.

15. Georgia

Jury: 10-25
Televote: 15-25
Total: 25-50

Georgia once again feels like a delegation that misunderstood the assignment entirely.

Almost every creative decision surrounding this entry has worked against its qualification chances. The staging lacks identity, the performance feels disconnected and there is no clear televote hook for casual viewers to latch onto.

In a stronger Semi this would have been completely dead on arrival and even in this weaker lineup it still looks comfortably headed for another non-qualification.

At this point, avoiding last place might be the more realistic objective.


Betting Time

If I was entering the market fresh today, these would be the three positions I would want in my book.

Greece to win SF1 — 25 units @ 4.10
San Marino to qualify — 25 units @ 4.70
Lithuania not to qualify — 50 units @ 3.00

As always, I will follow the traditional format of 100 units per Semi and 800 units reserved for the Final.

Good luck with your bets tonight and keep the conversation going on social media.


 


Monday, 11 May 2026

My Resolution for Eurovision 2026 - The Curious Case of Finland's 2026 favoritism


Disclaimer 1:
Finland will win Eurovision Song Contest.

Disclaimer 2: I have no bets on Finland.

Disclaimer 3: Nobody knows who will win Eurovision Song Contest yet...

This is my seventh year covering Eurovision on EurovisionBetsandpieces, and if you have followed this blog for a while, you already know one thing: backing the pre-rehearsal favourite has never really been my style.

Not because favourites cannot win.

Because they are very often too short.

This is my 20th Eurovision betting season, and if there is one lesson the market keeps teaching, it is that Eurovision is far less predictable than the odds often suggest.

That is why, ever since Finland took over the market early and never looked back, I have approached this pre-rehearsal period as if Finland has already won Eurovision 2026.

And still, I have not backed them.

Why I am not backing Finland

The answer is simple: price.

At around 2.20 on the exchanges, Finland is trading at roughly a 45% chance of winning.

For me, that is not value.

Yes, Finland has a strong package.

The song stands out. The performance lands. The duo are charismatic. The fanbase is fully engaged. The polls reflect genuine quality.

But none of that automatically makes 2.20 a fair number.

And before going any further:

I have nothing against Finland, any other country, or any artist.
This is a contest. Only one country wins.

Eurovision history says caution

Since juries returned in 2009, we have seen plenty of favourites trade at similar prices — and lose.

A few examples:

  • France '11 — finished 15th
  • Armenia '14— traded above 50%, finished 4th
  • Russia '16— traded above 60%, finished 3rd
  • Italy '17 — traded above 40%, finished 6th
  • Croatia  '24— traded above 50%, finished 2nd
  • Sweden  '25— traded around 50%, finished 4th

Yes, some favourites converted.

But the bigger picture matters more.

Since 2009, the pre-rehearsal favourite has only won 8 of the last 16 contests.

That is not dominance.

That is basically a coin flip.

The jury path looks narrower than the market suggests

I think Finland probably needs a jury top three minimum to win this contest.

More realistically, they probably need 200+ jury points, maybe closer to 225, to create real separation.

That is where I start getting cautious.

Recent voting patterns show that every year there are multiple juries that simply do not reward the main contenders heavily enough.

A meaningful bloc of countries consistently gives limited support — or none at all — to the eventual jury frontrunners.

That matters.

Because a 40%+ favourite should not have this many question marks.

And Finland does.

A song in Finnish may not be a huge problem.

But it only needs to be a small enough barrier with enough jurors to make the difference.

I can easily see blanks or weak jury returns from some key rivals’ natural voting areas.

That does not kill Finland’s chances.

It simply makes 2.20 look very tight.

Regional support is not automatic

This is another important point.

Finland does not come into this contest with automatic jury 12s waiting for them.

Over the last decade, Finland has received just three jury 12s in total.

Now add direct competition from:

  • Sweden
  • Denmark
  • Australia

That makes the regional picture much less straightforward than the market may be assuming.

For a favourite priced at 40%+, uncertainty matters.

And there is plenty of it.

The televote is not a free runway either

Finland should do well with the public.

The real question is whether they do well enough.

Israel remains a major obstacle here.

Over the last two years, Israel has dominated a large chunk of the televote 12s across Western Europe and beyond.

Then there is the likely Eastern support for Ukraine, diaspora voting, and the usual regional exchanges.

So the question becomes very simple:

Where exactly does Finland find enough big scores to lock down a top-three televote?

That answer is far from obvious.

Staging can still change everything

Right now, Finland arguably has the strongest package on paper.

But rehearsals are where markets get tested.

What happens if:

  • France delivers a standout visual moment?
  • Australia reveals something bigger than expected?
  • Greece finds a genuine live breakthrough?

At that point, margins become much thinner.

And short prices become much harder to justify.

My position

To be clear: Finland can absolutely win Eurovision next Saturday.

But I am betting price, not narrative.

And at current odds, Finland does not offer value.

This year I have deliberately reduced stress and kept my outright exposure smaller than usual.

My winner market position is currently split across:

  • Greece
  • France
  • Australia

That is roughly 25% of my total bankroll.

The objective is straightforward:

be profitable this season, even if I lose every outright winner ticket.

In Eurovision betting, there is often more value in chasing top 4, top 5, and top 10 markets than trying to force an outright position at a bad number.

Bottom line

This week is not about hedging.

It is about finding opportunities.

That is where profitable Eurovision weeks are built.

I have still used less than half of my bankroll, and I am happy to stay patient before placing my final bets.

My Semi-Final predictions will be up on Tuesday.

The real game starts now.




Tuesday, 5 May 2026

Know Your Numbers 2026 Edition - Part 2

Eurovision Voting Analysis: High Scores, Top-3 Patterns and National Tendencies

Every year, Eurovision delivers memorable performances, dramatic scoreboards and endless debate about how countries vote. While final rankings tell one story, a deeper understanding comes from examining where nations place their highest scores — the famous 12, 10 and 8 points.

This study focuses on the Top-3 scores awarded by each country through both the jury vote and the public televote. These numbers help explain how different countries approach voting — whether they reward consensus favourites, regional neighbours, diaspora-linked acts, or entries that appeal to distinct national tastes.

By keeping the full statistical structure for each country, we can compare voting behaviour more accurately and identify long-term trends.

In Part 1, I looked at Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria and Azerbaijan.

Part 2 continues the journey with Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia and Denmark — six countries with very different voting identities, from highly consistent consensus voters to nations where geography and long-standing cultural ties clearly shape the destination of those crucial high scores.

 


Belgium

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 5/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 8/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 7/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 16/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19

Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

Austria x3
Australia x1
Sweden x1
Italy x1
Switzerland x1
United Kingdom x1
France x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Italy 3/9
Sweden 3/9
France 3/9
Austria 3/6
Switzerland 3/6

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 4/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 7/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 8/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 17/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

Israel x2
Netherlands x2
Poland x1
Portugal x1
France x1
Ukraine x1
Finland x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

France 6/9
Netherlands 5/9
Israel 3/9

Overview

Belgium is one of the more reliable countries when it comes to rewarding the overall favourites with high scores. The jury tends to spread its support across western European entries, while the televote shows a clearer pattern, with France and the Netherlands regularly featuring strongly. More recently, Israel has also emerged as a notable televote favourite.




Bulgaria

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/5
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 1/5
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 1/5
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 2/15

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Austria x2
Armenia x1
Moldova x1
Greece x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Austria 2/5
Greece 2/5

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 3/5
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 4/5
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/5
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 9/15

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 12
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

Ukraine x1
Italy x1
Cyprus x1
France x1
Russia x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Moldova 2/5
Ukraine 2/5
France 2/5

Overview

Bulgaria has been something of a hit-and-miss country when it comes to jury voting, with support split between western and eastern entries and some signs of tactical voting during the late 2010s when Bulgaria itself was among the contenders. The televote has been far more accurate, with the bulk of high scores going to regional neighbours and familiar eastern European favourites.


Croatia

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 2/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 11/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 20
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

Italy x4
Portugal x1
Serbia x1
Lithuania x1
Hungary x1
Australia x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Italy 4/9
Switzerland 2/9
Portugal 2/9
Israel 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 0/8
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 5/8
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 2/8
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 16/24

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 14
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

Serbia x5
Estonia x1
Slovenia x1
Italy x1
Hungary x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Serbia 6/8
Italy 4/8
Slovenia 3/8
Ukraine 3/8

Overview

Croatian juries cast a very wide net, with 20 different countries appearing in their Top-3 over the period, but there is still a visible preference for Italy and other western entries. Interestingly, Serbia has yet to receive a jury Top-3 placing despite dominating Croatia’s televote. In the public vote, neighbours clearly take over, with Serbia by far the strongest long-term favourite.

Croatia is also one of only three countries in the 2026 line-up yet to award a televote winner the full 12 points, alongside Montenegro and Greece.




Cyprus

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 3/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 3/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 8/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 15
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Greece x5
Sweden x2
Croatia x1
Russia x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Greece 5/9
Italy 4/9
Australia 3/9
Sweden 2/9
France 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 1/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 12
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Greece x5
Bulgaria x2
Israel x1
Ukraine x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Greece 6/9
Israel 4/9
Ukraine 4/9

Overview

If there is one country that consistently rewards its closest friends, it is Cyprus. The jury combines its traditional preference for Greece with a wider western European spread, while the televote is even more predictable, with Greece, Israel, Ukraine and regional neighbours dominating the high scores.

Cyprus has also delivered the exact same televote Top-3 in the same order in each of the last two years — Greece, Israel, Ukraine — and it would likely have been three in a row had Greece qualified in 2023.




Czechia

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 2/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 4/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 10/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

Ukraine x2
Portugal x2
Sweden x2
Germany x1
Israel x1
United Kingdom x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Sweden 6/9
France 2/9
United Kingdom 2/9
Portugal 2/9
Ukraine 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 8/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 15/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 16
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Ukraine x6
Bulgaria x1
Moldova x1
Russia x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Ukraine 7/9
Israel 4/9
Moldova 2/9

Overview

Czechia’s jury voting leans strongly westward, but its televote has been more successful at identifying high-ranking Eurovision entries. Much of that is driven by Ukraine, which dominates Czech televote history.

One particularly striking trend: Czechia has yet to award a western country a televote 12 points, despite placing the televote winner in its Top-3 in eight of the last nine editions.


Denmark

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 3/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 7/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 13/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 17
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

Sweden x3
Switzerland x2
Latvia x1
Greece x1
Germany x1
Ukraine x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Sweden 4/9
Australia 3/9
Switzerland 3/9
Finland 2/9
Germany 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 4/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 5/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 15
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

Sweden x3
Croatia x1
Finland x1
Ukraine x1
Iceland x1
Norway x1
Germany x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Sweden 7/9
Norway 5/9
Iceland 2/9
Israel 2/9

Overview

Denmark’s voting profile is shaped strongly by Nordic ties. Sweden is the clear long-term favourite, collecting the most 12 points in both jury and televote.

The jury is slightly more open, spreading support across a broader European field, while the televote remains much more geographically focused, with Nordic neighbours regularly taking the biggest scores.

Saturday, 2 May 2026

Eurovision 2026: Gran Final Pre-Rehearsals Power Rankings


Eurovision 2026 Pre-Rehearsal Power Rankings

The calm before the staging storm.

Eurovision season has finally reached the point where theory meets reality.

With rehearsals starting today, we are officially entering the phase where carefully built narratives collide with camera angles, LED choices, vocal consistency and three minutes of live television.

Up to this point, the market has been relatively stable. But Eurojury added an extra layer of anchoring to the leading pack, giving us a stronger data point before the first rehearsal clips start reshaping the race.

And if Eurovision history has taught us anything, it is this: pre-rehearsal rankings often look hilarious two weeks later.

That is not a flaw in the process — that is the process.

Staging creates momentum. Momentum creates narratives. Narratives create points.

So here is my current projection before rehearsals begin.

Grab your popcorn.


The four countries with a realistic winning path

1. Greece

Juries: 5th — 160–180
Televote: 1st — 230–270
Projected total: 390–450

Why it can win

  • Eurojury confirmed that Greece is not simply a televote magnet. There is genuine jury accessibility here.
  • Greece has access to a very broad pool of high scores from both juries and televoters.
  • In a very static pre-rehearsal season, Greece is one of the few entries that feels like it is building momentum rather than merely holding position.

Why it might not

  • The staging could fail to elevate the song.
  • The Balkan/Eastern vote may fragment across Moldova, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania and Albania.
  • A runaway jury winner could cap its ceiling.

Data angle

My model had Greece above 175 jury points even before Eurojury began.

If jury points are diluted again this year, a jury top-three finish is entirely realistic. And if Greece clears the staging hurdle, it has the highest raw ceiling in the field.

Bottom line: Greece is currently the entry to beat.

(And yes — I’m Greek, so full disclosure applies.)


2. France

Juries: 2nd — 190–225
Televote: 4th — 150–175
Projected total: 340–400

Why it can win

  • France is not only selling a song this year — it is selling Monroe.
  • If the staging finds the sweet spot between intimacy and polish, France could hit the same cross-constituency zone that helped recent French contenders perform strongly.
  • The usual elite jury roadblocks are less dominant in this year’s field.

Why it might not

  • France has a long history of overthinking staging.
  • The song itself may not feel sufficiently distinctive.
  • There may be a degree of “opera fatigue” in the market.

Data angle

France has quietly been one of the most statistically resilient countries of the 50/50 era.

It has repeatedly:

  • finished in the jury top three
  • finished in the televote top four
  • collected points from a very broad geographic spread

That matters.

The fan bubble may have cooled on France too quickly.

If rehearsals land, France is absolutely live.


3. Finland

Juries: 3rd — 170–200
Televote: 3rd — 160–190
Projected total: 330–390

Why it can win

  • Finland is the cleanest compromise candidate between juries and televoters.
  • It leads the pre-rehearsal market and fan polls.
  • It already looks like a finished, high-impact package.

Why it might not

  • Pre-rehearsal favourites often underperform once the live contest begins.
  • It did not dominate Eurojury.
  • There are structural televote constraints in its regional scoring environment.

Data angle

The core question is not whether Finland can score well.

The question is whether it has enough of a “call to action” to become a winner rather than merely a very strong top-three finisher.

At the moment, I still think Finland’s clearest route runs through the juries.

And that is not guaranteed.


4. Australia

Juries: 1st — 200–230
Televote: 7th — 100–125
Projected total: 300–355

Why it can win

  • Australia has the strongest jury-winning profile in the field.
  • It is one of the few jury-friendly entries in English.
  • If the public connects enough, the maths become very interesting.

Why it might not

  • The song may read as slightly dated.
  • Australia historically tends to struggle more with televoters than with juries.

Data angle

Australia’s winning path is very simple:

It probably needs something close to a jury landslide.

If it gets near 300 jury points, the contest opens dramatically.

Without that, the televote deficit may simply be too large.


My current pre-rehearsal model

These are the four entries that I believe currently have a realistic winning path.

There are also strong podium-threat profiles — especially Israel, Denmark and Ukraine — but for now I still see them as needing more things to break perfectly.


Full Pre-Rehearsal Power Rankings

RankCountryTotalJuriesTelevote
1Greece390–450160–180230–270
2France340–400190–225150–175
3Finland330–390170–200160–190
4Australia300–355200–230100–125
5Israel250–30050–70200–230
6Denmark235–285170–20065–85
7Ukraine185–23060–80125–150
8Moldova170–22040–60130–160
9Italy160–20070–9090–110
10Malta130–175120–15010–25
11Cyprus130–17050–7080–100
12Albania125–17065–8560–85
13Romania100–14540–6060–85
14Switzerland85–12580–1105–15
15Norway80–12050–7030–50
16Sweden80–12050–7030–50
17Bulgaria75–11035–5040–60
18Lithuania45–6525–3520–30
19United Kingdom30–6015–3515–25
20Serbia35–5515–2520–30
21Estonia30–5020–3010–20
22Portugal30–5020–3010–20
23Montenegro25–4510–2015–25
24Germany10–305–155–15
25Austria0–200–100–10

Betting positions

This year I took a slightly different approach.

I entered early positions on:

  • Greece
  • France
  • Australia

Part of those positions were taken even before the songs were released.

At current prices:

  • Greece returns roughly 500% ROI (total investment)
  • France returns roughly 300% ROI (total investment)
  • Australia returns roughly 300% ROI (total investment)

Other open positions:

  • Moldova Top 10
  • Denmark Top 5 lay
  • Sweden Top 10–15 lay

I have intentionally kept around 70% of my bankroll uncommitted, with the aim of deploying roughly half of that during Eurovision week, when rehearsals usually create the biggest inefficiencies.


Final thought

This is the last ranking built mostly on song strength, structural voting pathways and pre-rehearsal data.

From today onward, Eurovision becomes a live-market sport.

A clever camera cut can add 40 points.
A weak first rehearsal can erase 80.

And that is exactly why this part of the season is so much fun.

Let’s see who survives contact with the stage.


Don't miss the Talk About ESC Things podcast episodes with our Pre-rehearsals prediction about the Jury Top-10 with Ben Robertson from ESCInsight as a special guest and the Televote Top-10 episode with Rob Furber from entertainmentodds.


Monday, 27 April 2026

Know Your Numbers 2026 Edition - Part 1

 

Eurovision Voting Analysis: High Scores, Top-3 Patterns and National Tendencies

Every year, Eurovision delivers memorable performances, dramatic scoreboards and endless debate about how countries vote. While final rankings tell one story, a deeper understanding comes from examining where nations place their highest scores — the famous 12, 10 and 8 points.

This study focuses on the Top-3 scores awarded by each country through both the jury vote and the public televote. These numbers help explain how different countries approach voting, whether they reward consensus favourites, regional neighbours, diaspora-linked acts, or entries that appeal to distinct national tastes.

By keeping the full statistical structure for each country, we can compare voting behaviour more accurately and identify long-term trends.


Albania

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 5/9
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 6/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 13/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 14
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

  • Italy x3
  • Switzerland x2
  • Australia x1
  • North Macedonia x1
  • Sweden x1
  • France x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Italy 5/9
  • Switzerland 4/6
  • France 3/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 4/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 2/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 10/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 15
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

  • Italy x3
  • Greece x2
  • Australia x1
  • Russia x1
  • Switzerland x1
  • Croatia x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Italy 9/9
  • Greece 3/6
  • Croatia 2/4
  • Bulgaria 2/5

Overview

Albania shows a clear long-term preference for Italy in both voting groups. The juries tend to follow broader Eurovision consensus choices, while the televote more strongly rewards regional and neighbouring countries.




Armenia

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/8
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 4/8
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 8/8
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/24
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

  • France x3
  • Sweden x2
  • Portugal x1
  • Spain x1
  • Israel x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • France 3/8
  • Sweden 3/8
  • Italy 3/8
  • Portugal 3/7

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/8
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 4/8
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 3/8
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 9/24
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

  • Russia x2
  • Cyprus x2
  • Estonia x2
  • Israel x1
  • France x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • France 4/8
  • Cyprus 3/6

Overview

Armenia has one of the strongest jury records for rewarding elite-performing entries, having always given its jury 12 points to a song that finished in the jury Top-3. The public vote is more selective, with stronger support for culturally connected countries.





Australia

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 0/8
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 2/8
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 9/26
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 20
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

  • Sweden x2
  • Belgium x2
  • United Kingdom x1
  • Malta x1
  • Spain x1
  • Ireland x1
  • Greece x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Sweden 3/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 5/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 6/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 7/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 16
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

  • Israel x3
  • Belgium x1
  • Moldova x1
  • Norway x1
  • Iceland x1
  • Ukraine x1
  • Finland x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Israel 3/8
  • Sweden 3/9

Overview

Australia’s juries are highly independent and widely spread, having included 20 countries in their jury Top-3 rankings. The televote is more aligned with broader public trends and often favours Nordic, Baltic and Israeli entries.





Austria

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 4/7
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 7/7
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 14/25
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 17
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 9

12 Points Distribution

  • Finland x1
  • Switzerland x1
  • Italy x1
  • United Kingdom x1
  • Iceland x1
  • North Macedonia x1
  • Israel x1
  • Netherlands x1
  • Australia x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Switzerland 3/6
  • Netherlands 3/7
  • Sweden 3/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 4/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 7/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 5/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 9

12 Points Distribution

  • Germany x1
  • Croatia x1
  • Finland x1
  • Ukraine x1
  • Serbia x1
  • Switzerland x1
  • Czechia x1
  • Portugal x1
  • Poland x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Italy 4/9
  • Serbia 3/7

Overview

Austria is one of the most evenly spread voters in Eurovision. It has awarded 12 points to a different country each year in both jury and televote, making it one of the least predictable countries.





Azerbaijan

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 2/9
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 3/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 8/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

  • Russia x3
  • Israel x2
  • Belarus x1
  • Albania x1
  • United Kingdom x1
  • Switzerland x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Russia 3/3
  • Albania 2/5
  • Israel 2/8
  • Ukraine 2/8
  • Sweden 2/9
  • Italy 2/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 5/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 8/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 17/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 17
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

  • Israel x4
  • Russia x2
  • Croatia x1
  • Ukraine x1
  • Bulgaria x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Israel 4/8
  • Ukraine 4/8

Overview

Azerbaijan shows one of the clearest jury-televote contrasts. The juries are less aligned with overall frontrunners, while the televote strongly backs popular mainstream contenders, especially Israel and Ukraine.





What These Patterns Tell Us About Eurovision

1. Juries and Publics Often Behave Like Two Different Countries

In many nations, jury and televote choices differ substantially. Albania and Azerbaijan are especially clear examples.

2. Some Countries Vote Predictably

Italy receiving Albania’s televote Top-3 every year demonstrates how recurring preferences matter over time.

3. Others Are Highly Volatile

Austria spreads support widely, making annual prediction difficult.

4. Consensus Winners Still Matter

Countries whose publics repeatedly reward eventual winners often act as strong indicators of broader momentum.


Why This Matters for Future Eurovision Predictions

When building forecasts, betting models or scoreboard simulations, looking only at past total points can miss important nuance. Top-3 allocation history helps identify:

  • Reliable allies
  • Jury-safe territories
  • Televote hotspots
  • Surprise point sources
  • Countries resistant to hype

These details often become decisive in close contests.

Final Conclusions

These figures highlight that Eurovision voting is rarely random. Some countries reward excellence as recognised across Europe, others prioritise cultural affinity, and many split sharply between jury professionalism and public emotion.

Studying Top-3 score allocations offers one of the most effective ways to understand future Eurovision voting behaviour, identify dependable allies, and anticipate scoreboard momentum before the first points are even announced.