Showing posts with label eurovision data. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eurovision data. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 September 2026

Eurovision Bets & Pieces: Predictions, Lessons and Resolutions for Eurovision 2027


Welcome to the second part of Eurovision Bets & Pieces’ resolutions!

How have I performed with my predictions and analyses of the Eurovision Grand Finals? What have I learned throughout the years, and what am I willing to change ahead of the Eurovision 2027 season?

It's time to look back at the numbers, revisit some of my biggest successes and failures, and set some new targets for the season ahead.

Winners: 3/7 — Keeping the Bigger Picture in Mind

My winner predictions on the day of each Grand Final were:

YearMy predicted winner
2019Netherlands
2021Italy
2022Italy
2023Sweden
2024Croatia
2025France
2026Australia

That's 3/7 correct calls. Not a particularly impressive record on its own.

France 2025 was by far my biggest miss. The same could be said about Italy in 2022, not because Italy finished sixth, but because I failed to identify Ukraine as the winner.

In my defence, Ukraine in 2022 and Switzerland in 2024 were both second in my predictions and were mentioned as potential winners. The same can be said about Bulgaria last year, which ranked third in my projections. I considered Bulgaria a genuine contender and tipped them to win as well.

That leaves Austria in 2025, which I had ranked fourth. It remains the lowest-ranked country in my predictions to actually win the contest.

This was also my most controversial call, and I still believe Austria managed to escape with the victory because a series of unfortunate events weakened the other favourites and front-runners, while Austria was the only country that did not suffer the same fate.

My prediction for the winner's path was not wrong: a jury winner scoring below 300 points, followed by a public vote in which the entry would collect mostly 4s, 6s and 8s from the majority of participating countries.

Five blanks in the jury vote and zero sets of 12 points in the public vote proved my point.

For additional context, Bulgaria last year received 54 fewer jury points than Austria, despite having two fewer countries voting, but was blanked by fewer countries than Austria.

Sometimes you play well and lose. Other times, you play badly and win. For me, that explains Austria and Eurovision 2025 in general.

Another thing you may have noticed is that I have generally avoided making the market favourite my predicted winner. I had Sweden second in 2025 and Finland fourth last year, despite both trading at odds of 1.65–1.90 on Grand Final day.

Although this article is not about betting odds, they always have an anchoring effect on predictions made on the day of the contest.

To put things into perspective, someone placing 1,000 units on Finland on Grand Final day would have received 1,800 units in return. To get the same return with Bulgaria, you needed to invest just 56 units that same morning.

My incorrect winner predictions finished as follows:

  • Italy 2022 — 6th
  • Croatia 2024 — 2nd
  • France 2025 — 7th
  • Australia 2026 — 4th

The lesson for Eurovision 2027: When predicting the winner, I need to keep the bigger picture in mind rather than becoming too focused on individual indicators or the market narrative.

Top 3: My Achilles' Heel

My record in this category was remarkably stable for years, correctly predicting two of the three podium finishers in every edition from 2019 to 2024.

Then came 2025, when I failed to predict a single country in the Top 3. Last year, Bulgaria was my only correct call.

Here are my predictions through the years:

Year1st2nd3rd
2019NetherlandsSwitzerlandItaly
2021ItalyMaltaSwitzerland
2022ItalyUkraineSpain
2023SwedenIsraelSpain
2024CroatiaSwitzerlandIsrael
2025FranceSwedenNetherlands
2026AustraliaGreeceBulgaria

Correct calls: 11/21 — 52.4%

Seven of my missed predictions still finished relatively close to the podium:

  • Three finished 4th: Switzerland 2019, Sweden 2025 and Australia 2026.
  • One finished 5th: Israel 2024.
  • One finished 6th: Italy 2022.
  • Two finished 7th: Malta 2021 and France 2025.

Then there are three predictions that went completely off track: Greece 2026, which finished 10th; the Netherlands 2025, which finished 12th; and Spain 2023, which finished 17th.

The devil is in the details. With the exception of Russia in 2019, which I had ranked seventh, most of the other actual Top-3 finishers were ranked fourth or fifth in my projections.

And here's another interesting pattern: for three consecutive years, and four times in the last five editions, the country I ranked fifth went on to finish in the Top 3.

Those countries were the UK in 2022, Ukraine in 2024, Estonia in 2025 and Israel in 2026.

The goal for Eurovision 2027 is to get back on track and achieve the first 3/3!

Top 5: Hitting the Bullseye

Now we're talking business!

I correctly predicted three of the Top 5 finishers in three editions, and four of the Top 5 in three other editions. In 2024 I predicted all five of the Top 5. My record in this category is one of the strongest parts of my Grand Final analysis.

This is also where most of the corrections happen. In 2025, for example, my 0/3 Top-3 record turned into three correct Top-5 predictions, thanks to having Austria fourth and Estonia fifth, while Sweden finished slightly lower than I had expected.

The same story repeated itself last year, when one correct Top-3 prediction turned into three correct Top-5 calls.

Here are my predictions for fourth and fifth place:

Year4th5th
2019AzerbaijanAustralia
2021UkraineFrance
2022SwedenUK
2023FinlandNorway
2024FranceUkraine
2025AustriaEstonia
2026FinlandIsrael

Correct calls: 26/35 — 74.3%

There are some interesting findings when looking at both positions.

My predictions become more reliable when it comes to this range of the scoreboard. The worst result for a country I predicted to finish fourth was Azerbaijan in 2019, which ended up eighth. There is also a winner in this category: Austria in 2025.

The most impressive statistic, however, comes from my predicted fifth-place finishers.

Three of them actually finished second: France in 2021, the UK in 2022 and Israel in 2026.

Two more finished third: Ukraine in 2024 and Estonia in 2025.

The lowest finish among my predicted fifth-place entries was Australia's ninth place in 2019.

In other words, my predictions around the fourth-to-fifth-place range have repeatedly identified countries with considerably higher finishing potential.

Top 10: Reaching for the Stars

Let's start with the lows.

I correctly predicted seven of the Top 10 finishers in three editions: 2019, 2023 and 2025. I got eight correct in 2022 and 2024, while my personal best came in 2021 and 2026, with nine correct calls.

Had I swapped France, which I projected 10th, with Denmark, projected 11th, last year, I would have achieved the ultimate 10/10!

Correct calls: 53/70 — 75.7%

There are a couple of interesting findings here.

Five of the seven countries I ranked 11th actually finished in the Top 10. The same happened to three of the seven countries I ranked 12th.

That means eight additional countries were just outside my predicted Top 10, despite eventually making it into the actual Top 10. These near misses show how much room there is for improvement in identifying the final qualifiers for that group.

Out of the 17 missed calls, only eight countries finished on the right-hand side of the scoreboard, in 14th place or lower.

Six of those eight misses came in just two editions:

  • 2019: Serbia, Belarus and Greece.
  • 2023: Spain, France and Armenia.

Looking at the bigger picture, my Top-10 predictions have generally been heading in the right direction.

There are only four cases in which a country finished 10th or lower despite being ranked in my Top 6: the Netherlands in 2022, Spain in 2023, the Netherlands in 2025 and Greece in 2026.

That's just 4/42.

The challenge for Eurovision 2027 is to turn those near misses into correct calls and improve the accuracy of my final Top-10 predictions.

Average Place Deviation per Country

Another way to measure the accuracy of my predictions is to calculate how far each country's predicted position was from its actual Grand Final result.

Here are the results for the seven editions so far:

YearAverage place deviation
20194.61
20213.15
20222.88
20234.15
20243.44
20253.61
20262.56

Eurovision 2026 was my most accurate year by far.

The biggest surprise, though, came in 2025. I expected my overall deviation to be considerably worse than in 2019 and 2023, but the final numbers told a different story.

My goal for Eurovision 2027 is to set a new personal record and bring the average place deviation below 2.50.

Eurovision Bets & Pieces vs The Model: Who Did It Better?

Do you need a model to predict Eurovision results? Can an algorithm solve the puzzle?

The results suggest that the answer is not quite that simple.

I have compared my predictions with those of the Model for the last three editions in which it has been running. Here are the findings.

Predicted Winners


Correct
Eurovision Bets & Pieces0/3
The Model1/3

My predictions were Croatia 2024, France 2025 and Australia 2026.

The Model predicted Switzerland 2024, Sweden 2025 and Finland 2026.

Top 3 Predictions


Correct
Eurovision Bets & Pieces3/9
The Model4/9

Top 5 Predictions


Correct
Eurovision Bets & Pieces11/15
The Model8/15

Top 10 Predictions


Correct
Eurovision Bets & Pieces24/30
The Model24/30

Average Place Deviation per Country

YearEurovision Bets & PiecesThe Model
20243.444.96
20253.615.19
20262.563.04

The Model identified more correct winners and Top-3 finishers, while we finished level in the Top-10 category.

On the other hand, Eurovision Bets & Pieces achieved more correct Top-5 predictions and a lower average place deviation in all three editions.

So, does the algorithm solve the Eurovision puzzle? Not entirely.

The results show that the Model can identify potential winners and podium finishers, while my own analysis has been more accurate when it comes to the broader Top 5 and the overall scoreboard.

The Man vs The Algorithm battle is far from over.

Eurovision 2027: What Comes Next?

Seven Grand Finals provide a useful dataset, but they also offer a reminder of how unpredictable Eurovision can be.

My priorities for the new season are clear:

  • Keep the bigger picture in mind when identifying potential winners.
  • Improve my Top-3 predictions and aim for the first 3/3.
  • Turn near misses into correct Top-10 calls.
  • Set a new personal record for average place deviation, below 2.50.
  • Continue testing my analysis against the Model.

The numbers show where my predictions have been most consistent and where there is still room for improvement. The challenge now is to turn those lessons into a more accurate and reliable Eurovision 2027 prediction system.

And, of course, to keep looking for the signals that the market might be missing.

The next season is just around the corner. Let's see what the numbers have in store for us!

Eurovision Bets & Pieces — The Man vs The Algorithm, continued in 2027.


 

Tuesday, 5 May 2026

Know Your Numbers 2026 Edition - Part 2

Eurovision Voting Analysis: High Scores, Top-3 Patterns and National Tendencies

Every year, Eurovision delivers memorable performances, dramatic scoreboards and endless debate about how countries vote. While final rankings tell one story, a deeper understanding comes from examining where nations place their highest scores — the famous 12, 10 and 8 points.

This study focuses on the Top-3 scores awarded by each country through both the jury vote and the public televote. These numbers help explain how different countries approach voting — whether they reward consensus favourites, regional neighbours, diaspora-linked acts, or entries that appeal to distinct national tastes.

By keeping the full statistical structure for each country, we can compare voting behaviour more accurately and identify long-term trends.

In Part 1, I looked at Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria and Azerbaijan.

Part 2 continues the journey with Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia and Denmark — six countries with very different voting identities, from highly consistent consensus voters to nations where geography and long-standing cultural ties clearly shape the destination of those crucial high scores.

 


Belgium

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 5/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 8/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 7/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 16/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19

Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

Austria x3
Australia x1
Sweden x1
Italy x1
Switzerland x1
United Kingdom x1
France x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Italy 3/9
Sweden 3/9
France 3/9
Austria 3/6
Switzerland 3/6

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 4/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 7/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 8/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 17/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

Israel x2
Netherlands x2
Poland x1
Portugal x1
France x1
Ukraine x1
Finland x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

France 6/9
Netherlands 5/9
Israel 3/9

Overview

Belgium is one of the more reliable countries when it comes to rewarding the overall favourites with high scores. The jury tends to spread its support across western European entries, while the televote shows a clearer pattern, with France and the Netherlands regularly featuring strongly. More recently, Israel has also emerged as a notable televote favourite.




Bulgaria

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/5
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 1/5
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 1/5
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 2/15

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Austria x2
Armenia x1
Moldova x1
Greece x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Austria 2/5
Greece 2/5

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 3/5
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 4/5
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/5
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 9/15

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 12
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

Ukraine x1
Italy x1
Cyprus x1
France x1
Russia x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Moldova 2/5
Ukraine 2/5
France 2/5

Overview

Bulgaria has been something of a hit-and-miss country when it comes to jury voting, with support split between western and eastern entries and some signs of tactical voting during the late 2010s when Bulgaria itself was among the contenders. The televote has been far more accurate, with the bulk of high scores going to regional neighbours and familiar eastern European favourites.


Croatia

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 2/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 11/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 20
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

Italy x4
Portugal x1
Serbia x1
Lithuania x1
Hungary x1
Australia x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Italy 4/9
Switzerland 2/9
Portugal 2/9
Israel 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 0/8
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 5/8
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 2/8
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 16/24

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 14
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

Serbia x5
Estonia x1
Slovenia x1
Italy x1
Hungary x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Serbia 6/8
Italy 4/8
Slovenia 3/8
Ukraine 3/8

Overview

Croatian juries cast a very wide net, with 20 different countries appearing in their Top-3 over the period, but there is still a visible preference for Italy and other western entries. Interestingly, Serbia has yet to receive a jury Top-3 placing despite dominating Croatia’s televote. In the public vote, neighbours clearly take over, with Serbia by far the strongest long-term favourite.

Croatia is also one of only three countries in the 2026 line-up yet to award a televote winner the full 12 points, alongside Montenegro and Greece.




Cyprus

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 3/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 3/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 8/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 15
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Greece x5
Sweden x2
Croatia x1
Russia x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Greece 5/9
Italy 4/9
Australia 3/9
Sweden 2/9
France 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 1/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 12
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Greece x5
Bulgaria x2
Israel x1
Ukraine x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Greece 6/9
Israel 4/9
Ukraine 4/9

Overview

If there is one country that consistently rewards its closest friends, it is Cyprus. The jury combines its traditional preference for Greece with a wider western European spread, while the televote is even more predictable, with Greece, Israel, Ukraine and regional neighbours dominating the high scores.

Cyprus has also delivered the exact same televote Top-3 in the same order in each of the last two years — Greece, Israel, Ukraine — and it would likely have been three in a row had Greece qualified in 2023.




Czechia

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 2/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 4/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 10/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

Ukraine x2
Portugal x2
Sweden x2
Germany x1
Israel x1
United Kingdom x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Sweden 6/9
France 2/9
United Kingdom 2/9
Portugal 2/9
Ukraine 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 8/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 15/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 16
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 4

12 Points Distribution

Ukraine x6
Bulgaria x1
Moldova x1
Russia x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Ukraine 7/9
Israel 4/9
Moldova 2/9

Overview

Czechia’s jury voting leans strongly westward, but its televote has been more successful at identifying high-ranking Eurovision entries. Much of that is driven by Ukraine, which dominates Czech televote history.

One particularly striking trend: Czechia has yet to award a western country a televote 12 points, despite placing the televote winner in its Top-3 in eight of the last nine editions.


Denmark

Jury Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 3/9
Jury Winner in the Top-3: 7/9
Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 13/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 17
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

Sweden x3
Switzerland x2
Latvia x1
Greece x1
Germany x1
Ukraine x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

Sweden 4/9
Australia 3/9
Switzerland 3/9
Finland 2/9
Germany 2/9

Public Vote

Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 4/9
Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 5/9
Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27

Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 15
Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

Sweden x3
Croatia x1
Finland x1
Ukraine x1
Iceland x1
Norway x1
Germany x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

Sweden 7/9
Norway 5/9
Iceland 2/9
Israel 2/9

Overview

Denmark’s voting profile is shaped strongly by Nordic ties. Sweden is the clear long-term favourite, collecting the most 12 points in both jury and televote.

The jury is slightly more open, spreading support across a broader European field, while the televote remains much more geographically focused, with Nordic neighbours regularly taking the biggest scores.

Monday, 27 April 2026

Know Your Numbers 2026 Edition - Part 1

 

Eurovision Voting Analysis: High Scores, Top-3 Patterns and National Tendencies

Every year, Eurovision delivers memorable performances, dramatic scoreboards and endless debate about how countries vote. While final rankings tell one story, a deeper understanding comes from examining where nations place their highest scores — the famous 12, 10 and 8 points.

This study focuses on the Top-3 scores awarded by each country through both the jury vote and the public televote. These numbers help explain how different countries approach voting, whether they reward consensus favourites, regional neighbours, diaspora-linked acts, or entries that appeal to distinct national tastes.

By keeping the full statistical structure for each country, we can compare voting behaviour more accurately and identify long-term trends.


Albania

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 5/9
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 6/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in the total of Top-3s: 13/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 14
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

  • Italy x3
  • Switzerland x2
  • Australia x1
  • North Macedonia x1
  • Sweden x1
  • France x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Italy 5/9
  • Switzerland 4/6
  • France 3/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 4/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 2/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 10/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 15
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

  • Italy x3
  • Greece x2
  • Australia x1
  • Russia x1
  • Switzerland x1
  • Croatia x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Italy 9/9
  • Greece 3/6
  • Croatia 2/4
  • Bulgaria 2/5

Overview

Albania shows a clear long-term preference for Italy in both voting groups. The juries tend to follow broader Eurovision consensus choices, while the televote more strongly rewards regional and neighbouring countries.




Armenia

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 1/8
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 4/8
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 8/8
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/24
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

  • France x3
  • Sweden x2
  • Portugal x1
  • Spain x1
  • Israel x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • France 3/8
  • Sweden 3/8
  • Italy 3/8
  • Portugal 3/7

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 1/8
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 4/8
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 3/8
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 9/24
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 13
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

  • Russia x2
  • Cyprus x2
  • Estonia x2
  • Israel x1
  • France x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • France 4/8
  • Cyprus 3/6

Overview

Armenia has one of the strongest jury records for rewarding elite-performing entries, having always given its jury 12 points to a song that finished in the jury Top-3. The public vote is more selective, with stronger support for culturally connected countries.





Australia

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 0/8
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 2/8
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 4/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 9/26
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 20
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

  • Sweden x2
  • Belgium x2
  • United Kingdom x1
  • Malta x1
  • Spain x1
  • Ireland x1
  • Greece x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Sweden 3/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 5/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 6/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 7/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 16
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 7

12 Points Distribution

  • Israel x3
  • Belgium x1
  • Moldova x1
  • Norway x1
  • Iceland x1
  • Ukraine x1
  • Finland x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Israel 3/8
  • Sweden 3/9

Overview

Australia’s juries are highly independent and widely spread, having included 20 countries in their jury Top-3 rankings. The televote is more aligned with broader public trends and often favours Nordic, Baltic and Israeli entries.





Austria

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 4/7
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 7/7
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 14/25
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 17
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 9

12 Points Distribution

  • Finland x1
  • Switzerland x1
  • Italy x1
  • United Kingdom x1
  • Iceland x1
  • North Macedonia x1
  • Israel x1
  • Netherlands x1
  • Australia x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Switzerland 3/6
  • Netherlands 3/7
  • Sweden 3/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 4/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 7/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 5/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 12/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 9

12 Points Distribution

  • Germany x1
  • Croatia x1
  • Finland x1
  • Ukraine x1
  • Serbia x1
  • Switzerland x1
  • Czechia x1
  • Portugal x1
  • Poland x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Italy 4/9
  • Serbia 3/7

Overview

Austria is one of the most evenly spread voters in Eurovision. It has awarded 12 points to a different country each year in both jury and televote, making it one of the least predictable countries.





Azerbaijan

Jury Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Jury Winners: 2/9
  • Jury Winner in the Top-3: 5/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 3/9
  • Jury Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 8/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 19
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 6

12 Points Distribution

  • Russia x3
  • Israel x2
  • Belarus x1
  • Albania x1
  • United Kingdom x1
  • Switzerland x1

Most Voted Countries in Jury Top-3

  • Russia 3/3
  • Albania 2/5
  • Israel 2/8
  • Ukraine 2/8
  • Sweden 2/9
  • Italy 2/9

Public Vote

  • Sets of 12 points awarded to Public Vote Winners: 5/9
  • Public Vote Winner in the Top-3: 8/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries awarded with sets of 12 points: 6/9
  • Public Vote Top-3 entries included in total Top-3s: 17/27
  • Number of countries voted in the Top-3: 17
  • Number of countries awarded 12 points: 5

12 Points Distribution

  • Israel x4
  • Russia x2
  • Croatia x1
  • Ukraine x1
  • Bulgaria x1

Most Voted Countries in Public Top-3

  • Israel 4/8
  • Ukraine 4/8

Overview

Azerbaijan shows one of the clearest jury-televote contrasts. The juries are less aligned with overall frontrunners, while the televote strongly backs popular mainstream contenders, especially Israel and Ukraine.





What These Patterns Tell Us About Eurovision

1. Juries and Publics Often Behave Like Two Different Countries

In many nations, jury and televote choices differ substantially. Albania and Azerbaijan are especially clear examples.

2. Some Countries Vote Predictably

Italy receiving Albania’s televote Top-3 every year demonstrates how recurring preferences matter over time.

3. Others Are Highly Volatile

Austria spreads support widely, making annual prediction difficult.

4. Consensus Winners Still Matter

Countries whose publics repeatedly reward eventual winners often act as strong indicators of broader momentum.


Why This Matters for Future Eurovision Predictions

When building forecasts, betting models or scoreboard simulations, looking only at past total points can miss important nuance. Top-3 allocation history helps identify:

  • Reliable allies
  • Jury-safe territories
  • Televote hotspots
  • Surprise point sources
  • Countries resistant to hype

These details often become decisive in close contests.

Final Conclusions

These figures highlight that Eurovision voting is rarely random. Some countries reward excellence as recognised across Europe, others prioritise cultural affinity, and many split sharply between jury professionalism and public emotion.

Studying Top-3 score allocations offers one of the most effective ways to understand future Eurovision voting behaviour, identify dependable allies, and anticipate scoreboard momentum before the first points are even announced.

Friday, 24 April 2026

Semi Final 2: The Running Order and the Pre-everything Power Rankings

 


The running order for Semi-Final 2 allows us to integrate slot allocation into the predictive model, and the outcome is clear: this is the most competitive Semi-Final we have seen since 2019.

From a modelling perspective, this is a high-density qualification environment, where up to fourteen entries present viable qualification pathways. Unlike Semi-Final 1, which is skewed towards televote-driven entries, Semi-Final 2 is dominated by jury-oriented compositions, with a smaller number of high-efficiency televote drivers layered on top.

A second key structural difference is the distribution of competitive strength across the running order. Semi-Final 2 features a strong second half cluster, which introduces downward pressure on the televote ceilings of early performers such as Bulgaria, Romania, and Armenia.

The model therefore projects minimal separation margins between 8th and 12th place, with qualification likely determined by marginal gains across either constituency rather than dominant scoring.


Running Order Impact

Norway emerges as the primary beneficiary of the draw across both Semi-Finals. A hybrid entry with dual-constituency appeal receives the pimp slot, significantly increasing its expected televote conversion and overall qualification certainty. While qualification was already highly probable, the draw now elevates Norway into a high-confidence qualifier with Top-5 upside.

The decision to schedule Denmark, Australia, and Ukraine consecutively (#10–#12) suggests a production buffer (likely interval or staging reset), while also clustering the three strongest contenders. Their relatively early positioning aligns with recent producer strategy: front-loading high-certainty qualifiers to create space for borderline entries later in the show.

On the negative side, Latvia and Armenia are the clearest structural losers. Latvia is trapped in a jury-saturated segment, requiring outperformance against direct competitors. Armenia, meanwhile, faces both running order compression and reduced diaspora support, significantly weakening its qualification pathway.

Romania, Luxembourg, and Czechia also experience moderate negative slot impact, while Azerbaijan remains modelled as a non-competitive baseline entry regardless of draw.


Semi-Final 2 Analysis

(50/50 era: 2016–2025; Jury calibration: 2016–2022)


1. Bulgaria

Model Classification: High-efficiency opener (hybrid)
Slot Impact: Positive

Bulgaria combines strong jury literacy with reliable televote conversion. As an opener, it benefits from maximum exposure while retaining competitive scoring potential across both axes.

Projection:
Juries: 60–80 pts
Public Vote: 90–110 pts
Total: 150–190 pts

Qualification Probability: >95%
Top-5 Probability: ~65%


2. Azerbaijan

Model Classification: Non-competitive baseline
Slot Impact: Neutral

Azerbaijan continues to underperform across both constituencies, with negligible televote engagement and limited jury recovery potential.

Projection:
Juries: 5–15 pts
Public Vote: 0–10 pts
Total: 5–25 pts

Qualification Probability: <5%


3. Romania

Model Classification: Televote-dependent hybrid
Slot Impact: Negative (early compression)

Romania relies on diaspora activation and moderate jury tolerance. The early slot reduces televote ceiling, increasing reliance on efficient point distribution.

Projection:
Juries: 35–45 pts
Public Vote: 75–90 pts
Total: 110–135 pts

Qualification Probability: ~65–75%


4. Luxembourg

Model Classification: Jury-leaning low-ceiling entry
Slot Impact: Negative

Luxembourg enters a more competitive field with limited margin for error. Qualification requires both overperformance and underperformance elsewhere.

Projection:
Juries: 40–50 pts
Public Vote: 20–30 pts
Total: 60–80 pts

Qualification Probability: ~30–40%


5. Czechia

Model Classification: Jury-dependent volatile entry
Slot Impact: Negative

Czechia’s qualification pathway is almost entirely jury-driven. Without a Top-5 jury finish, conversion probability drops sharply.

Projection:
Juries: 60–80 pts
Public Vote: 20–35 pts
Total: 80–115 pts

Qualification Probability: ~45–55%


6. Armenia

Model Classification: Televote-reliant outlier
Slot Impact: Strong negative

Armenia faces both structural and contextual disadvantages. Qualification requires a high televote finish combined with minimal jury suppression.

Projection:
Juries: 15–30 pts
Public Vote: 50–75 pts
Total: 65–105 pts

Qualification Probability: ~35–45%


7. Switzerland

Model Classification: Jury-dominant stabiliser
Slot Impact: Positive (relative uplift vs competitors)

Switzerland follows a proven model: maximise jury scoring to offset televote volatility. In a jury-heavy Semi, this increases relative strength.

Projection:
Juries: 80–105 pts
Public Vote: 15–30 pts
Total: 95–135 pts

Qualification Probability: ~70–80%


8. Cyprus

Model Classification: High-efficiency televote driver
Slot Impact: Neutral-positive

Cyprus offers strong televote potential with sufficient jury baseline to secure qualification. Upside includes Semi-Final podium contention.

Projection:
Juries: 50–70 pts
Public Vote: 110–130 pts
Total: 160–200 pts

Qualification Probability: >95%
Top-3 Probability: ~30–40%


9. Latvia

Model Classification: Jury-cluster competitor
Slot Impact: Negative

Latvia must outperform multiple direct competitors within a saturated jury segment. Public vote contribution remains limited.

Projection:
Juries: 60–80 pts
Public Vote: 15–30 pts
Total: 75–110 pts

Qualification Probability: ~40–50%


10. Denmark

Model Classification: High-end hybrid contender
Slot Impact: Neutral

Denmark enters the contender cluster with strong jury upside and moderate televote support. Winning the Semi is within range, though not guaranteed.

Projection:
Juries: 100–120 pts
Public Vote: 70–90 pts
Total: 170–210 pts

Qualification Probability: >99%
Win Probability: ~15–20%


11. Australia

Model Classification: Peak jury performer / hybrid contender
Slot Impact: Neutral-positive

Australia combines elite jury performance history with sufficient televote recovery. The model identifies this as the highest total scoring projection in the Semi.

Projection:
Juries: 140–160 pts
Public Vote: 90–110 pts
Total: 230–270 pts

Qualification Probability: >99%
Win Probability: ~30–35%


12. Ukraine

Model Classification: Televote-dominant elite contender
Slot Impact: Neutral

Ukraine maintains one of the strongest televote baselines in Eurovision history. Jury contribution determines ceiling.

Projection:
Juries: 70–90 pts
Public Vote: 130–150 pts
Total: 200–240 pts

Qualification Probability: >99%
Win Probability: ~25–30%


13. Albania

Model Classification: Balanced but threshold-sensitive
Slot Impact: Negative (post-contender compression)

Albania requires balanced scoring across both constituencies. Positioned after the contender cluster, visibility risk increases.

Projection:
Juries: 30–50 pts
Public Vote: 40–60 pts
Total: 70–110 pts

Qualification Probability: ~40–50%


14. Malta

Model Classification: Jury-maximisation strategy
Slot Impact: Positive

Malta’s pathway is clear: secure a Top-5 jury result and neutralise televote weakness.

Projection:
Juries: 100–120 pts
Public Vote: 15–35 pts
Total: 115–155 pts

Qualification Probability: ~75–85%


15. Norway

Model Classification: High-efficiency closer (hybrid)
Slot Impact: Strong positive (pimp slot)

Norway benefits most from the draw. Strong dual-constituency performance combined with final-slot recall significantly increases conversion probability.

Projection:
Juries: 80–100 pts
Public Vote: 80–100 pts
Total: 160–200 pts

Qualification Probability: >95%
Top-5 Probability: ~50–60%


Pre-Eurojury / Pre-Rehearsals Power Rankings

  1. Australia — Total: 230–270 pts (Juries: 140–160, Public: 90–110)
  2. Ukraine — Total: 200–240 pts (Juries: 70–90, Public: 130–150)
  3. Denmark — Total: 170–210 pts (Juries: 100–120, Public: 70–90)
  4. Cyprus — Total: 160–200 pts (Juries: 50–70, Public: 110–130)
  5. Norway — Total: 160–200 pts (Juries: 80–100, Public: 80–100)
  6. Bulgaria — Total: 150–190 pts (Juries: 60–80, Public: 90–110)
  7. Malta — Total: 115–155 pts (Juries: 100–120, Public: 15–35)
  8. Romania — Total: 110–135 pts (Juries: 35–45, Public: 75–90)
  9. Switzerland — Total: 95–135 pts (Juries: 80–105, Public: 15–30)
  10. Czechia — Total: 80–115 pts (Juries: 60–80, Public: 20–35)
  11. Latvia — Total: 75–110 pts (Juries: 60–80, Public: 15–30)
  12. Albania — Total: 70–110 pts (Juries: 30–50, Public: 40–60)
  13. Armenia — Total: 65–105 pts (Juries: 15–30, Public: 50–75)
  14. Luxembourg — Total: 60–80 pts (Juries: 40–50, Public: 20–30)
  15. Azerbaijan — Total: 5–25 pts (Juries: 5–15, Public: 0–10)

Model Outputs

  • Estimated Qualification Threshold: ~95–110 points
  • High Confidence Qualifiers (>90%): Australia, Ukraine, Denmark, Cyprus, Norway, Bulgaria
  • Volatility Cluster (7th–13th): Malta, Romania, Switzerland, Czechia, Latvia, Albania, Armenia
  • Low Probability Group: Luxembourg, Azerbaijan